<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1380 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264712</link>
    <description>For the period before insertion of the second proviso to Rule 3(7)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, credit on inputs cleared by a 100% EOU under Notification No. 23/2003-Central Excise extended to the additional customs duty component, including Education Cess and Secondary &amp; Higher Education Cess embedded in that duty, because the restriction was confined to the basic customs duty component. The text also notes that a refund claim for excess credit debited on the basis of an asserted calculation mistake was rejected where the assessee had itself accepted the mistake and produced no material to dislodge the lower authority&#039;s finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1380 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264712</link>
      <description>For the period before insertion of the second proviso to Rule 3(7)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, credit on inputs cleared by a 100% EOU under Notification No. 23/2003-Central Excise extended to the additional customs duty component, including Education Cess and Secondary &amp; Higher Education Cess embedded in that duty, because the restriction was confined to the basic customs duty component. The text also notes that a refund claim for excess credit debited on the basis of an asserted calculation mistake was rejected where the assessee had itself accepted the mistake and produced no material to dislodge the lower authority&#039;s finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>