<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1372 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264704</link>
    <description>The appeal against the demand of excise duty on office furniture systems/work stations cleared without payment of duty was allowed. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and reinstated the original order confirming duty and penalty. The Tribunal relied on Supreme Court decisions stating that office furniture is not immovable property. As the respondents did not dispute manufacturing and payment of duty upon assembly, and failed to prove the items were immovable property, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1372 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264704</link>
      <description>The appeal against the demand of excise duty on office furniture systems/work stations cleared without payment of duty was allowed. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and reinstated the original order confirming duty and penalty. The Tribunal relied on Supreme Court decisions stating that office furniture is not immovable property. As the respondents did not dispute manufacturing and payment of duty upon assembly, and failed to prove the items were immovable property, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>