https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264699 The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, overturning the earlier order of confiscation/redemption upheld by the first appellate authority. The decision concluded that the rice exported met the specified length and ratio requirements for Basmati Rice under the notification, emphasizing that Eggmark testing was not mandated and AGMARK standards were not determinative. Previous judgments supporting exporters' claims under specific notifications were considered, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant and granting consequential relief if necessary. en-us Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:25:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264699 The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, overturning the earlier order of confiscation/redemption upheld by the first appellate authority. The decision concluded that the rice exported met the specified length and ratio requirements for Basmati Rice under the notification, emphasizing that Eggmark testing was not mandated and AGMARK standards were not determinative. Previous judgments supporting exporters' claims under specific notifications were considered, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant and granting consequential relief if necessary. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264699