https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264670 The Supreme Court clarified that the power exercised under Article 226 is original jurisdiction, not supervisory jurisdiction. Writs of certiorari against appellate tribunals can be treated under either Article 226 or 227, depending on the circumstances. It was emphasized that the tribunal or court whose order is challenged must be impleaded as a party in the petition. The Court concluded that the maintainability of an Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) depends on various factors, including the nature of the order and jurisdiction invoked. Orders passed by civil courts are only subject to scrutiny under Article 227. The matters were remanded to the High Court for further proceedings. en-us Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264670 The Supreme Court clarified that the power exercised under Article 226 is original jurisdiction, not supervisory jurisdiction. Writs of certiorari against appellate tribunals can be treated under either Article 226 or 227, depending on the circumstances. It was emphasized that the tribunal or court whose order is challenged must be impleaded as a party in the petition. The Court concluded that the maintainability of an Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) depends on various factors, including the nature of the order and jurisdiction invoked. Orders passed by civil courts are only subject to scrutiny under Article 227. The matters were remanded to the High Court for further proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264670