<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (11) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174087</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and remanded the case for further examination, directing the High Court to allow the writ petitioners to file affidavits in response to the State&#039;s supplemental counter affidavit. The High Court was instructed to determine whether the challenged fees constitute court fees or taxes on litigants. The appeal was granted, and the case was sent back for additional proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (11) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174087</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and remanded the case for further examination, directing the High Court to allow the writ petitioners to file affidavits in response to the State&#039;s supplemental counter affidavit. The High Court was instructed to determine whether the challenged fees constitute court fees or taxes on litigants. The appeal was granted, and the case was sent back for additional proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>