https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174086 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is confined to keeping subordinate courts within their authority and cannot be used as an appellate remedy where the Code of Civil Procedure provides appeal or revision against execution orders. The available remedies under Order XLIII Rule 1(j), Section 47 and Section 115 made the High Court petition inappropriate. After an auction sale and intervening third-party rights, satisfaction of the decree or adjustment cannot be certified under Order XXI Rule 2, and the sale can be challenged only through the specific execution remedy within limitation. The later application was therefore barred by constructive res judicata and limitation under Article 127 of the Limitation Act. en-us Tue, 04 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:26:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174086 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is confined to keeping subordinate courts within their authority and cannot be used as an appellate remedy where the Code of Civil Procedure provides appeal or revision against execution orders. The available remedies under Order XLIII Rule 1(j), Section 47 and Section 115 made the High Court petition inappropriate. After an auction sale and intervening third-party rights, satisfaction of the decree or adjustment cannot be certified under Order XXI Rule 2, and the sale can be challenged only through the specific execution remedy within limitation. The later application was therefore barred by constructive res judicata and limitation under Article 127 of the Limitation Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174086