<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 348 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174079</link>
    <description>Section 6(3-A) of the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 was analysed as a State law on agricultural land within Gujarat, not as extraterritorial legislation. The provision merely treated land held outside the State as a factor for computing the ceiling applicable to land held within Gujarat. Applying the real and sufficient territorial nexus test, the provision was found to remain within the State&#039;s legislative competence because the operative burden attached only to land in Gujarat. The challenge to invalidity on grounds of extraterritorial operation therefore failed, and the provision was upheld as valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 348 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174079</link>
      <description>Section 6(3-A) of the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 was analysed as a State law on agricultural land within Gujarat, not as extraterritorial legislation. The provision merely treated land held outside the State as a factor for computing the ceiling applicable to land held within Gujarat. Applying the real and sufficient territorial nexus test, the provision was found to remain within the State&#039;s legislative competence because the operative burden attached only to land in Gujarat. The challenge to invalidity on grounds of extraterritorial operation therefore failed, and the provision was upheld as valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>