https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174063 Article 227 confers judicial superintendence over subordinate courts and tribunals within the territorial jurisdiction, and that power is not limited to administrative control. It is to be exercised sparingly to keep such authorities within the bounds of their lawful jurisdiction, not merely to correct errors. Where the Rent Controller and District Judge declined to do what the law required and thereby refused to exercise vested jurisdiction, supervisory interference was justified. The Judicial Commissioner was therefore competent to interfere, and the ejectment order was upheld. en-us Tue, 19 Jan 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:44:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174063 Article 227 confers judicial superintendence over subordinate courts and tribunals within the territorial jurisdiction, and that power is not limited to administrative control. It is to be exercised sparingly to keep such authorities within the bounds of their lawful jurisdiction, not merely to correct errors. Where the Rent Controller and District Judge declined to do what the law required and thereby refused to exercise vested jurisdiction, supervisory interference was justified. The Judicial Commissioner was therefore competent to interfere, and the ejectment order was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Jan 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174063