https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174062 Expert academic selection methods based on mean and standard deviation were upheld as a scientific basis for fixing subject-wise and aggregate cut-offs in the JEE 2006 admission process. Judicial review was confined to illegality, arbitrariness, caprice, mala fides, or breach of statutory rules, and no material showed bias, manipulation, or ulterior motive. The Board's later explanations were treated as fuller disclosure of the same procedure, not a contradictory change in method. A candidate's high aggregate score could not cure failure to satisfy the prescribed minimum in an individual subject, so no ground for interference was made out. en-us Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174062 Expert academic selection methods based on mean and standard deviation were upheld as a scientific basis for fixing subject-wise and aggregate cut-offs in the JEE 2006 admission process. Judicial review was confined to illegality, arbitrariness, caprice, mala fides, or breach of statutory rules, and no material showed bias, manipulation, or ulterior motive. The Board's later explanations were treated as fuller disclosure of the same procedure, not a contradictory change in method. A candidate's high aggregate score could not cure failure to satisfy the prescribed minimum in an individual subject, so no ground for interference was made out. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174062