<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1334 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed input service credit on Housekeeping and Repair of Motor Vehicles but upheld the denial of CENVAT Credit on Commission Agent services. The demand for the extended period of limitation was set aside. For Outdoor Catering Services, the Appellant was directed to reverse credit on the portion of cost borne by workers. The penalty imposed was set aside as it related to the admissibility of input service credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:29:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1334 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed input service credit on Housekeeping and Repair of Motor Vehicles but upheld the denial of CENVAT Credit on Commission Agent services. The demand for the extended period of limitation was set aside. For Outdoor Catering Services, the Appellant was directed to reverse credit on the portion of cost borne by workers. The penalty imposed was set aside as it related to the admissibility of input service credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>