https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264653 The Tribunal upheld the denial of cross-examination of witnesses, citing admissions by key individuals regarding stock shortages and removal of goods. Discrepancies in quantities on invoices were noted, with the appellant's failure to produce invoices leading to an adverse inference. The Tribunal confirmed allegations of clandestine removal of goods based on admitted shortages and the use of parallel invoices. Penalties were reduced for the appellant company and its director, with final orders confirming duty demands and adjusting penalties accordingly. The judgment was pronounced on 31.7.2015. en-us Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:28:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264653 The Tribunal upheld the denial of cross-examination of witnesses, citing admissions by key individuals regarding stock shortages and removal of goods. Discrepancies in quantities on invoices were noted, with the appellant's failure to produce invoices leading to an adverse inference. The Tribunal confirmed allegations of clandestine removal of goods based on admitted shortages and the use of parallel invoices. Penalties were reduced for the appellant company and its director, with final orders confirming duty demands and adjusting penalties accordingly. The judgment was pronounced on 31.7.2015. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264653