https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264649 Joint and several confirmation of duty demand and penalties against multiple noticees was held contrary to settled legal principles because each assessee's liability had not been independently determined. The impugned order was set aside on that ground. The Tribunal also required fresh examination of the objections relating to non-supply of documents and the request for cross-examination, as those procedural issues had to be reconsidered by the adjudicating authority in line with earlier directions. The matter was remanded for de novo adjudication on individual liability and for fresh decision on the procedural grievances. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:27:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264649 Joint and several confirmation of duty demand and penalties against multiple noticees was held contrary to settled legal principles because each assessee's liability had not been independently determined. The impugned order was set aside on that ground. The Tribunal also required fresh examination of the objections relating to non-supply of documents and the request for cross-examination, as those procedural issues had to be reconsidered by the adjudicating authority in line with earlier directions. The matter was remanded for de novo adjudication on individual liability and for fresh decision on the procedural grievances. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264649