<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1316 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the demand for customs duty, interest, and penalties on the importer was barred by limitation as there was no evidence of collusion or fraud. Therefore, the demand was deemed unsustainable. Penalties on the Superintendent of Central Excise and a Custom House Agent were set aside due to lack of evidence, while penalties on the exporter and its Director were upheld for manipulating export documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1316 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the demand for customs duty, interest, and penalties on the importer was barred by limitation as there was no evidence of collusion or fraud. Therefore, the demand was deemed unsustainable. Penalties on the Superintendent of Central Excise and a Custom House Agent were set aside due to lack of evidence, while penalties on the exporter and its Director were upheld for manipulating export documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>