<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1313 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of appeals dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit order, emphasizing the importance of the right to appeal and considering the appellant&#039;s financial difficulties. The Tribunal rejected the application of the doctrine of merger as the High Court only extended the pre-deposit deadline without addressing the merits. A separate opinion was expressed, arguing that the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to restore appeals after the High Court&#039;s specified deadline is violated. The matter was referred to a Third Member to resolve the difference of opinion on the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction post-High Court&#039;s pre-deposit deadline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1313 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of appeals dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit order, emphasizing the importance of the right to appeal and considering the appellant&#039;s financial difficulties. The Tribunal rejected the application of the doctrine of merger as the High Court only extended the pre-deposit deadline without addressing the merits. A separate opinion was expressed, arguing that the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to restore appeals after the High Court&#039;s specified deadline is violated. The matter was referred to a Third Member to resolve the difference of opinion on the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction post-High Court&#039;s pre-deposit deadline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>