<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1310 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264642</link>
    <description>Early hearing applications in proceedings arising from rejection of customs broker licence applications may be allowed where financial hardship, alleged breach of natural justice, and the need for expeditious disposal are shown satisfactorily. The Tribunal granted early hearing on that basis and recorded only a prima facie objection on maintainability, noting that an appeal under Regulation 21 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 and Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 was not available to persons who were not customs brokers and that the impugned order was neither suspension nor revocation of licence. The maintainability issue was left for separate consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1310 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264642</link>
      <description>Early hearing applications in proceedings arising from rejection of customs broker licence applications may be allowed where financial hardship, alleged breach of natural justice, and the need for expeditious disposal are shown satisfactorily. The Tribunal granted early hearing on that basis and recorded only a prima facie objection on maintainability, noting that an appeal under Regulation 21 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 and Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 was not available to persons who were not customs brokers and that the impugned order was neither suspension nor revocation of licence. The maintainability issue was left for separate consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>