<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 279 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174053</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1980, and the Karnataka Debt Relief Act, 1976, rejecting challenges on legislative competence, violation of Article 19(1)(f) and (g), and violation of Article 14. The court emphasized interpreting constitutional provisions liberally and considering the social and economic context in assessing law reasonableness. All writ petitions, civil appeals, and special leave petitions were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:22:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 279 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174053</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1980, and the Karnataka Debt Relief Act, 1976, rejecting challenges on legislative competence, violation of Article 19(1)(f) and (g), and violation of Article 14. The court emphasized interpreting constitutional provisions liberally and considering the social and economic context in assessing law reasonableness. All writ petitions, civil appeals, and special leave petitions were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>