<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 720 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174052</link>
    <description>The Court upheld its jurisdiction under Section 130(E) of the Customs Act, finding that the appeal was maintainable as it pertained to penalties, not the rate of duty or valuation of goods. The objection raised by the Respondents was dismissed, allowing the Court to proceed with hearing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 720 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174052</link>
      <description>The Court upheld its jurisdiction under Section 130(E) of the Customs Act, finding that the appeal was maintainable as it pertained to penalties, not the rate of duty or valuation of goods. The objection raised by the Respondents was dismissed, allowing the Court to proceed with hearing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>