<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 1026 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174045</link>
    <description>A tribunal&#039;s factual finding will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is shown to be perverse, unsupported by evidence, or affected by legal error. The Supreme Court treated the dispute as a pure question of fact and found no basis for appellate interference because the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was sustainable on the record. The civil appeal was therefore dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:38:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 1026 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174045</link>
      <description>A tribunal&#039;s factual finding will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is shown to be perverse, unsupported by evidence, or affected by legal error. The Supreme Court treated the dispute as a pure question of fact and found no basis for appellate interference because the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was sustainable on the record. The civil appeal was therefore dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>