<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1305 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264637</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the subsequent order passed by the Assessing Officer. The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling the pre-conditions for reopening assessments beyond the specified time limit and highlighted the necessity for concrete evidence of undisclosed material facts to justify such actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:23:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1305 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264637</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the subsequent order passed by the Assessing Officer. The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling the pre-conditions for reopening assessments beyond the specified time limit and highlighted the necessity for concrete evidence of undisclosed material facts to justify such actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>