<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1293 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264625</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that no penalty was justifiable under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2003-04. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s genuine mistake, rectification in good faith, and the absence of intent to evade tax obligations. The judgment emphasized the importance of good faith and aligns with the principle that inadvertent errors do not imply intent to conceal income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1293 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264625</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that no penalty was justifiable under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2003-04. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s genuine mistake, rectification in good faith, and the absence of intent to evade tax obligations. The judgment emphasized the importance of good faith and aligns with the principle that inadvertent errors do not imply intent to conceal income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>