https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174041 Omission of the limitation provision in the motor accident compensation framework is treated as removing the time bar for claim petitions filed after that omission. The text states that, once Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act was omitted, claims could not be rejected as time-barred merely because the accident occurred under an earlier limitation regime. It also explains that Section 6A of the General Clauses Act could not preserve the former limit against a contrary legislative intent, and Article 137 of the Limitation Act could not be used to reintroduce a limitation period into a beneficial statute for accident victims and their families. en-us Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 22:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174041 Omission of the limitation provision in the motor accident compensation framework is treated as removing the time bar for claim petitions filed after that omission. The text states that, once Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act was omitted, claims could not be rejected as time-barred merely because the accident occurred under an earlier limitation regime. It also explains that Section 6A of the General Clauses Act could not preserve the former limit against a contrary legislative intent, and Article 137 of the Limitation Act could not be used to reintroduce a limitation period into a beneficial statute for accident victims and their families. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174041