https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174037 A disciplinary finding cannot stand where the evidence does not reasonably connect the charged employee to the alleged misconduct. The material here was found insufficient because the relevant witness was not examined, the documentary evidence was neutral, and the employee's own statement did not support the charge. On that basis, a finding of guilt based on no evidence was treated as vulnerable to judicial interference in writ proceedings. The dismissal was therefore held unsustainable, and compensation was indicated in place of reinstatement. en-us Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Sep 2015 17:36:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174037 A disciplinary finding cannot stand where the evidence does not reasonably connect the charged employee to the alleged misconduct. The material here was found insufficient because the relevant witness was not examined, the documentary evidence was neutral, and the employee's own statement did not support the charge. On that basis, a finding of guilt based on no evidence was treated as vulnerable to judicial interference in writ proceedings. The dismissal was therefore held unsustainable, and compensation was indicated in place of reinstatement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174037