<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1236 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174034</link>
    <description>The special leave petition was dismissed in view of the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier ruling in SICOM Limited, indicating that the same legal position governed the controversy and no further relief was warranted. The order records condonation of delay but gives no separate substantive ruling on the merits beyond applying the existing precedent to dispose of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1236 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174034</link>
      <description>The special leave petition was dismissed in view of the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier ruling in SICOM Limited, indicating that the same legal position governed the controversy and no further relief was warranted. The order records condonation of delay but gives no separate substantive ruling on the merits beyond applying the existing precedent to dispose of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>