<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1281 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264613</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals and granted consequential reliefs, holding that the services were eligible for refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST. It determined that debit notes were valid documents for claiming refunds and emphasized that the appellant should not be burdened with proving the service provider&#039;s registration under port services. The rejection of the refund claims was deemed unjustified, and the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1281 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264613</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals and granted consequential reliefs, holding that the services were eligible for refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST. It determined that debit notes were valid documents for claiming refunds and emphasized that the appellant should not be burdened with proving the service provider&#039;s registration under port services. The rejection of the refund claims was deemed unjustified, and the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>