<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1279 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of a well-defined show cause notice and the right of the assessee to defend themselves adequately. The decision highlighted the need for specificity and clarity in allegations of tax evasion to ensure fairness and adherence to legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1279 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of a well-defined show cause notice and the right of the assessee to defend themselves adequately. The decision highlighted the need for specificity and clarity in allegations of tax evasion to ensure fairness and adherence to legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>