<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1275 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264607</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on Outdoor Catering Services was settled by previous court decisions. However, the credit for the cost recovered from employees was deemed inadmissible as per the law laid down by the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court. The appeal on this aspect was disallowed. Regarding the number of employees in the factory, the Tribunal rejected the order passed by the First Appellate Authority as the certification provided by the Administrator indicated more than 250 workmen, leading to the appeal being disallowed only on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1275 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264607</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on Outdoor Catering Services was settled by previous court decisions. However, the credit for the cost recovered from employees was deemed inadmissible as per the law laid down by the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court. The appeal on this aspect was disallowed. Regarding the number of employees in the factory, the Tribunal rejected the order passed by the First Appellate Authority as the certification provided by the Administrator indicated more than 250 workmen, leading to the appeal being disallowed only on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>