https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264602 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal solely on the ground of limitation, emphasizing the importance of adhering to limitation periods in tax matters and procedural compliance to protect parties' rights. The case involved excise duty demand based on manufacturing activities at a loaned factory, with Show Cause Notices issued and subsequently dropped. The CESTAT set aside the demand in the fourth notice, ruling it was barred by limitation due to the dropped earlier notices. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264602 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal solely on the ground of limitation, emphasizing the importance of adhering to limitation periods in tax matters and procedural compliance to protect parties' rights. The case involved excise duty demand based on manufacturing activities at a loaned factory, with Show Cause Notices issued and subsequently dropped. The CESTAT set aside the demand in the fourth notice, ruling it was barred by limitation due to the dropped earlier notices. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264602