https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264584 The judgment confirmed a Provisional Attachment Order under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, finding individuals had committed offenses and laundered proceeds of crime. The Adjudicating Authority upheld the attachment, stating the properties were linked to money laundering crimes. A challenge was made against a notice for property possession by the Directorate of Enforcement. A statutory appeal under Section 26 of the Money-Laundering Act was addressed, allowing appellants to proceed with the appeal or seek a stay. The Appellate Authority was empowered to decide on stay applications and expedite appeals within six months. The writ petition was disposed of, directing a halt to proceedings pending appeal resolution. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2016 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264584 The judgment confirmed a Provisional Attachment Order under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, finding individuals had committed offenses and laundered proceeds of crime. The Adjudicating Authority upheld the attachment, stating the properties were linked to money laundering crimes. A challenge was made against a notice for property possession by the Directorate of Enforcement. A statutory appeal under Section 26 of the Money-Laundering Act was addressed, allowing appellants to proceed with the appeal or seek a stay. The Appellate Authority was empowered to decide on stay applications and expedite appeals within six months. The writ petition was disposed of, directing a halt to proceedings pending appeal resolution. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264584