https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264583 Regulation 16 of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 was read as not expressly barring the Disciplinary Committee or Council from considering the complainant's submissions in the disciplinary process. Any concern arising from non-supply of those submissions could ordinarily be cured by furnishing copies and giving the respondent an opportunity to answer them. On a prima facie view, the procedure adopted was not shown to breach natural justice, and no prejudice was established to justify restraining the further enquiry. Interim relief was therefore refused. en-us Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Sep 2017 15:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264583 Regulation 16 of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 was read as not expressly barring the Disciplinary Committee or Council from considering the complainant's submissions in the disciplinary process. Any concern arising from non-supply of those submissions could ordinarily be cured by furnishing copies and giving the respondent an opportunity to answer them. On a prima facie view, the procedure adopted was not shown to breach natural justice, and no prejudice was established to justify restraining the further enquiry. Interim relief was therefore refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264583