<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 868 - CEGAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding Customs Duty for a short receipt of imported goods at the factory premises. The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit, successfully argued against the allegations of a discrepancy in quantity received, citing actual weighment records and a previous Tribunal decision in their favor. The Tribunal emphasized that there was no transit loss and allowed the appeal, concluding that the demand for duty was unjustified under the remission provisions of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:38:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 868 - CEGAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding Customs Duty for a short receipt of imported goods at the factory premises. The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit, successfully argued against the allegations of a discrepancy in quantity received, citing actual weighment records and a previous Tribunal decision in their favor. The Tribunal emphasized that there was no transit loss and allowed the appeal, concluding that the demand for duty was unjustified under the remission provisions of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>