<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 633 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174020</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 as null and void due to the AO&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening the assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of furnishing reasons within a reasonable time, citing legal precedents. As a result, the confirmation of additions made by the Assessing Officer was not addressed, as the assessment itself was invalidated. The judgment was pronounced on 25th March 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 14:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 633 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174020</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 as null and void due to the AO&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening the assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of furnishing reasons within a reasonable time, citing legal precedents. As a result, the confirmation of additions made by the Assessing Officer was not addressed, as the assessment itself was invalidated. The judgment was pronounced on 25th March 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>