<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (4) TMI 17 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174019</link>
    <description>Interest on arrears of rent from agricultural land was held to be agricultural income because it was sufficiently connected with and derived from the land through the agricultural tenancy, so it remained exempt from tax. Salami or premium received for granting building leases was treated as a capital receipt on the facts found, since it was consideration for leasehold rights and not rent in advance or business income, so it was not assessable to income-tax. Both questions were answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:37:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (4) TMI 17 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174019</link>
      <description>Interest on arrears of rent from agricultural land was held to be agricultural income because it was sufficiently connected with and derived from the land through the agricultural tenancy, so it remained exempt from tax. Salami or premium received for granting building leases was treated as a capital receipt on the facts found, since it was consideration for leasehold rights and not rent in advance or business income, so it was not assessable to income-tax. Both questions were answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>