https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174014 Railway loading law distinguishes maximum carrying capacity, normal carrying capacity and permissible carrying capacity, with the last term referring to the operative load limit below the statutory maximum. Rule 161A of the Goods Tariff was upheld as a valid delegated provision governing excess loading charges and was not displaced by the Eastern Railway Coal Tariff rules. Penal charges for overloading were recoverable from consignors, consignees or endorsees under both the old and new regimes, the levy was treated as an additional carriage charge rather than an arbitrary exaction, and the railway lien extended to such dues. No refund or restraint on future collection followed once the levy was sustained. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:50:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174014 Railway loading law distinguishes maximum carrying capacity, normal carrying capacity and permissible carrying capacity, with the last term referring to the operative load limit below the statutory maximum. Rule 161A of the Goods Tariff was upheld as a valid delegated provision governing excess loading charges and was not displaced by the Eastern Railway Coal Tariff rules. Penal charges for overloading were recoverable from consignors, consignees or endorsees under both the old and new regimes, the levy was treated as an additional carriage charge rather than an arbitrary exaction, and the railway lien extended to such dues. No refund or restraint on future collection followed once the levy was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174014