<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1242 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264574</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the maintainability of a writ petition under extraordinary jurisdiction, which contested a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act and reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2009-10, was dismissed. The court upheld the decision that the writ petition was maintainable in circumstances where the jurisdiction of issuing the notice under section 148 was in dispute. The court emphasized the justiciability of such notices and the importance of jurisdictional errors as valid grounds for challenges. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the original decision in favor of the respondent company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1242 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264574</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the maintainability of a writ petition under extraordinary jurisdiction, which contested a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act and reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2009-10, was dismissed. The court upheld the decision that the writ petition was maintainable in circumstances where the jurisdiction of issuing the notice under section 148 was in dispute. The court emphasized the justiciability of such notices and the importance of jurisdictional errors as valid grounds for challenges. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the original decision in favor of the respondent company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>