<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1235 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264567</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The errors were deemed inadvertent, not a deliberate act of furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealing income. The judgment emphasized the distinction between making an incorrect claim and furnishing inaccurate particulars, aligning with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1235 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264567</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The errors were deemed inadvertent, not a deliberate act of furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealing income. The judgment emphasized the distinction between making an incorrect claim and furnishing inaccurate particulars, aligning with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>