<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 436 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174002</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the first issue, finding insufficient evidence to support the addition of unexplained investment. However, on the second issue, the Court sided with the Department, affirming that the assessee had been given adequate opportunities for explanation. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 12:19:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 436 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174002</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the first issue, finding insufficient evidence to support the addition of unexplained investment. However, on the second issue, the Court sided with the Department, affirming that the assessee had been given adequate opportunities for explanation. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>