<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1219 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264551</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal filed by the appellant and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. It held that the services provided by the appellant were export services and not subject to service tax. The extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable, and the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1219 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264551</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal filed by the appellant and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. It held that the services provided by the appellant were export services and not subject to service tax. The extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable, and the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>