<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1212 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264544</link>
    <description>A writ appeal challenging cancellation of an eligibility certificate was held not maintainable because the State Industries Department, which issued and cancelled the certificate, was the proper aggrieved authority and no valid impleadment or authorisation cured the defect. On merits, cancellation was unsustainable where the certificate had been granted on a bona fide and possible view under the exemption scheme; later withdrawal based on absence of manufacturing activity and plant or machinery at site was treated as a mere change of opinion on a debatable eligibility question, not a proved breach or false disclosure. The quashing of the cancellation orders was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:18:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1212 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264544</link>
      <description>A writ appeal challenging cancellation of an eligibility certificate was held not maintainable because the State Industries Department, which issued and cancelled the certificate, was the proper aggrieved authority and no valid impleadment or authorisation cured the defect. On merits, cancellation was unsustainable where the certificate had been granted on a bona fide and possible view under the exemption scheme; later withdrawal based on absence of manufacturing activity and plant or machinery at site was treated as a mere change of opinion on a debatable eligibility question, not a proved breach or false disclosure. The quashing of the cancellation orders was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>