<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1210 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264542</link>
    <description>Printed grey wrappers used for packing cigarettes were treated as products of the printing industry and classified under heading 4901.90 rather than heading 4823.90. On that classification, the goods attracted nil rate of duty, so the central excise demand could not survive. As the demand itself failed, the consequential penalties were also unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1210 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264542</link>
      <description>Printed grey wrappers used for packing cigarettes were treated as products of the printing industry and classified under heading 4901.90 rather than heading 4823.90. On that classification, the goods attracted nil rate of duty, so the central excise demand could not survive. As the demand itself failed, the consequential penalties were also unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>