https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264538 The Tribunal upheld the classification of Niacin (Feed Grade) under Tariff Item 29362920, rejecting the appellant's arguments for classification under Chapter 23. The duty demand for the normal period of limitation was upheld, with no applicability of the extended time period, confiscation, fine, or penalty. The appellant's plea for cum-duty price benefits was rejected, and the Tribunal ordered the payment of interest corresponding to the upheld duty amount. en-us Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264538 The Tribunal upheld the classification of Niacin (Feed Grade) under Tariff Item 29362920, rejecting the appellant's arguments for classification under Chapter 23. The duty demand for the normal period of limitation was upheld, with no applicability of the extended time period, confiscation, fine, or penalty. The appellant's plea for cum-duty price benefits was rejected, and the Tribunal ordered the payment of interest corresponding to the upheld duty amount. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264538