https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264524 Pre-execution interference with preventive detention under COFEPOSA is confined to exceptional cases and will not follow merely from delay or alleged staleness. The court noted that a detention order may be vulnerable if the live nexus between the material and the detaining authority's satisfaction has broken down, but accepted a satisfactory explanation for the time taken in investigation and attempted service, so the challenge on staleness failed. It also reiterated that pre-detention review is limited to narrow grounds such as wrong statute, wrong person, wrong purpose, vague or irrelevant grounds, or lack of power, and found no exceptional basis for extraordinary intervention. en-us Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264524 Pre-execution interference with preventive detention under COFEPOSA is confined to exceptional cases and will not follow merely from delay or alleged staleness. The court noted that a detention order may be vulnerable if the live nexus between the material and the detaining authority's satisfaction has broken down, but accepted a satisfactory explanation for the time taken in investigation and attempted service, so the challenge on staleness failed. It also reiterated that pre-detention review is limited to narrow grounds such as wrong statute, wrong person, wrong purpose, vague or irrelevant grounds, or lack of power, and found no exceptional basis for extraordinary intervention. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264524