<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1189 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264521</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the Criminal Revision, acquitting the petitioner of all charges due to the absence of the Trust/College being arrayed as an accused, thereby negating the vicarious liability of the petitioner. The judgment emphasized the importance of correctly impleading juridical persons and individuals in cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act to ensure accountability and adherence to legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:16:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1189 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264521</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the Criminal Revision, acquitting the petitioner of all charges due to the absence of the Trust/College being arrayed as an accused, thereby negating the vicarious liability of the petitioner. The judgment emphasized the importance of correctly impleading juridical persons and individuals in cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act to ensure accountability and adherence to legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>