<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that advertisement expenses incurred by a marketing services company for promoting aerated products should not be included in the assessable costs of non-alcoholic beverages manufactured by the respondent. The Court emphasized the distinction between advertisement costs incurred by the marketing services company and the manufacturer, citing a previous case involving similar issues. The judgment underscored the significance of contractual obligations and legal precedents in determining assessable costs under excise laws. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that advertisement expenses incurred by a marketing services company for promoting aerated products should not be included in the assessable costs of non-alcoholic beverages manufactured by the respondent. The Court emphasized the distinction between advertisement costs incurred by the marketing services company and the manufacturer, citing a previous case involving similar issues. The judgment underscored the significance of contractual obligations and legal precedents in determining assessable costs under excise laws. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>