<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1182 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264514</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete disallowances for unexplained investment, unexplained expenditure, and unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately discharged its onus, and the AO failed to provide sufficient contrary evidence. Both appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:15:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1182 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264514</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete disallowances for unexplained investment, unexplained expenditure, and unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately discharged its onus, and the AO failed to provide sufficient contrary evidence. Both appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>