<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1144 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173982</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, restoring the original order and confirming the duty, interest, and penalty on the respondent for the clandestine removal of 395 cartons of tobacco product. The Tribunal found that the respondent&#039;s failure to provide a satisfactory explanation and their silence during the investigation indicated an intention to prevent scrutiny, justifying the imposition of penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 18:16:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1144 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173982</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, restoring the original order and confirming the duty, interest, and penalty on the respondent for the clandestine removal of 395 cartons of tobacco product. The Tribunal found that the respondent&#039;s failure to provide a satisfactory explanation and their silence during the investigation indicated an intention to prevent scrutiny, justifying the imposition of penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>