<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 920 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173970</link>
    <description>Coverage under the Employees&#039; State Insurance Act depends on a notification issued under Section 1(5), not on automatic inclusion of all establishments. The term &quot;shop&quot; is undefined in the Act and notification, so it must be read in its ordinary commercial sense; on that approach, a club is not ordinarily treated as a shop. The broader meaning of &quot;industry&quot; used in another statute cannot be imported, because statutory definitions are context-specific and transferable only where enactments are in pari materia. On that basis, a turf club is prima facie not a shop within the Act or the notification, and the earlier contrary view required reconsideration by a larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 16:19:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 920 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173970</link>
      <description>Coverage under the Employees&#039; State Insurance Act depends on a notification issued under Section 1(5), not on automatic inclusion of all establishments. The term &quot;shop&quot; is undefined in the Act and notification, so it must be read in its ordinary commercial sense; on that approach, a club is not ordinarily treated as a shop. The broader meaning of &quot;industry&quot; used in another statute cannot be imported, because statutory definitions are context-specific and transferable only where enactments are in pari materia. On that basis, a turf club is prima facie not a shop within the Act or the notification, and the earlier contrary view required reconsideration by a larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>