https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432 Permitting use of trademark and design in return for royalty, even with associated technical know-how, supervision and marketing support, was not treated as rendering engineering consultancy. The arrangement was characterised as a transaction in property for use of intellectual property rights, and the incidental technical assistance did not establish engineering advice or consultancy within the taxable entry. On that basis, the activity was held outside the scope of Consulting Engineer service, and the service tax demand could not be sustained. en-us Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432 Permitting use of trademark and design in return for royalty, even with associated technical know-how, supervision and marketing support, was not treated as rendering engineering consultancy. The arrangement was characterised as a transaction in property for use of intellectual property rights, and the incidental technical assistance did not establish engineering advice or consultancy within the taxable entry. On that basis, the activity was held outside the scope of Consulting Engineer service, and the service tax demand could not be sustained. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432