https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264494 The Supreme Court held that final anti-dumping duty cannot be imposed during the gap period between the expiry of provisional duty and the imposition of final duty. The interpretation aligns with the WTO Agreement, ensuring conformity with international obligations. The Court allowed the appeals by the assessees and dismissed the revenue's appeal. The decision clarifies that duty imposition during the gap period is impermissible, while other issues remain unaffected. en-us Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264494 The Supreme Court held that final anti-dumping duty cannot be imposed during the gap period between the expiry of provisional duty and the imposition of final duty. The interpretation aligns with the WTO Agreement, ensuring conformity with international obligations. The Court allowed the appeals by the assessees and dismissed the revenue's appeal. The decision clarifies that duty imposition during the gap period is impermissible, while other issues remain unaffected. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264494