https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173962 A prior writ direction requiring a representation did not finally dispose of the employee's claim for higher special allowances or bar further recourse after rejection of that representation. Because the High Court had not examined the grievance on merits, the dispute required substantive adjudication. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and remanded the matter for consideration on merits. en-us Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:24:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173962 A prior writ direction requiring a representation did not finally dispose of the employee's claim for higher special allowances or bar further recourse after rejection of that representation. Because the High Court had not examined the grievance on merits, the dispute required substantive adjudication. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and remanded the matter for consideration on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173962