<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE (MADRAS)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the constitutionality of Section 65(3) and Section 67(k) of the Finance Act, 1994. It held that Section 67(k) is consistent with other provisions and that Rule 6(7) is valid and within the rule-making power. The court found that the valuation of taxable services based on the commission received by air travel agents is connected to the services provided to customers and upheld the provisions and rules under challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE (MADRAS)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the constitutionality of Section 65(3) and Section 67(k) of the Finance Act, 1994. It held that Section 67(k) is consistent with other provisions and that Rule 6(7) is valid and within the rule-making power. The court found that the valuation of taxable services based on the commission received by air travel agents is connected to the services provided to customers and upheld the provisions and rules under challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>